I Am Against HR 848

Related Issues:  Media / Culture , Taxation , Free Speech

Tags:  radio , hr 848 , free radio

Monday, 05/18/2009 @ 06:25 AM
To whom it may concern:
To whom it may concern:

To whom it may concern:
I am writing to ask you to oppose the creation of a new Tax on Radio in the form of a performance fee that will be forced on local radio stations if H.R. 848/S. 379 were to become law.

H.R. 848/S. 379 would lead to disastrous consequences for the radio industry and would force many radio stations out of business, result in job loss and less diversity on the air. There is no greater threat to the viability of local free over-the-air radio than this proposed tax.

A new intellectual property right for the record labels, most of which are foreign owned, amounts to a tax on local radio that could be the difference between radio’s future success or failure.

In addition, I ask that you immediately cosponsor H.C.R 49, “The Local Radio Freedom Act” to take a stand now for your hometown radio stations. Your co-sponsorship of this resolution will send a strong message of disapproval to Speaker Nancy Pelosi against full House consideration of H.R. 848/S. 379. This action could ultimately be the difference between survival and extinction for radio stations in your district.

Your Constituent Amy Hall
Your Constituent
sunflowerladi
View All    |   Sort by Newest First
Letter Comments
Total Comments: 3
wmtuck,  on 05/22/2009 @ 09:30 AM  wrote:
I think that it is important when one discuses or comments on an issue that one be intellectually honest. This letter is misleading as evidenced in some of the previous comments. This bill does not propose to "tax" radio stations. It does propose to require radio stations to pay "royalties" for the use of copyrighted material. Copyright holders cannot collect taxes, government do that. They can collect fees, payments, charges, royalties, etc. I would think that the copyright laws already allow owners to charge a fee for use of their copyrighted music. It is therefore between the radio station and the musician (or copyright holder) to negotiate a deal for the use of the music. NOT the government. I support the letter on the grounds that it is none of the government's business but not because stations will face a new "tax". Don't confuse the issues that only makes you sound as though you do not know of what you speak. Read the bill before you mouth off!
mikitymike,  on 06/02/2009 @ 08:45 PM  wrote:
Pointless. A couple bucks won't make up for all of the radio stations and jobs lost.
holyguyver,  on 06/19/2009 @ 05:12 PM  wrote:
I agree radio & the arts should be free & open. People should not be made into one robotic force that marches tro the same drum beat. We should be free to listen to whatever form of entertainment we want.