Mexico's Glass House - I Wanted to Share

Related Issues:  Immigration Policy , Illegal Immigration

Tags:  immigration , mexico , constitution

Monday, 05/05/2008 @ 08:59 PM
To whom it may concern:

Mexico's glass house

How the Mexican constitution treats foreign residents, workers and naturalized citizens

By J. Michael Waller Posted: Thursday, April 6, 2006

PAPERS & STUDIES Center for Security Policy   Publication Date: April 6, 2006

Introduction Every country has the right - and duty - to restrict the quality and quantity of foreign immigrants entering or living within its borders. If American policymakers are looking for legal models on which to base new laws restricting immigration and expelling foreign lawbreakers, they have a handy guide: the Mexican constitution.[1] 

Adopted in 1917, the constitution of the United Mexican States borrows heavily from American constitutional and legal principles. It combines those principles with a strong sense nationalism, cultural self-identity, paternalism, and state power. Mexico's constitution contains many provisions to protect the country from foreigners, including foreigners legally resident in the country and even foreign-born people who have become naturalized Mexican citizens.

The Mexican constitution segregates immigrants and naturalized citizens from native-born citizens by denying immigrants basic human rights that Mexican immigrants enjoy in the United States. By making increasing demands that the U.S. not enforce its immigration laws and, indeed, that it liberalize them, Mexico is throwing stones within its own glass house.

This paper, the first of a short series on Mexican immigration double standards, examines the Mexican constitution's protections against immigrants, and concludes with some questions about U.S. policy.  

Summary

In brief, the Mexican Constitution states that:  Immigrants and foreign visitors are banned from public political discourse. Immigrants and foreigners are denied certain basic property rights. Immigrants are denied equal employment rights. Immigrants and naturalized citizens will never be treated as real Mexican citizens. Immigrants and naturalized citizens are not to be trusted in public service. Immigrants and naturalized citizens may never become members of the clergy. Private citizens may make citizens arrests of lawbreakers (i.e., illegal immigrants) and hand them to the authorities. Immigrants may be expelled from Mexico for any reason and without due process.

The Mexican constitution: Unfriendly to immigrants 

Mexico's constitution expressly forbids non-citizens to participate in the country's political life. Non-citizens are forbidden to participate in demonstrations or express opinions in public about domestic politics. Article 9 states, "only citizens of the Republic may do so to take part in the political affairs of the country." Article 33 is unambiguous: "Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country.

"The Mexican constitution denies fundamental property rights to foreigners. If foreigners wish to have certain property rights, they must renounce the protection of their own governments or risk confiscation. Foreigners are forbidden to own land in Mexico within 100 kilometers of land borders or within 50 kilometers of the coast. Article 27 states,

"Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters. The State may grant the same right to foreigners, provided they agree before the Ministry of Foreign Relations to consider themselves as nationals in respect to such property, and bind themselves not to invoke the protection of their governments in matters relating thereunto; under penalty, in case of noncompliance with this agreement, of forfeiture of the property acquired to the Nation. Under no circumstances may foreigners acquire direct ownership of lands or waters within a zone of one hundred kilometers along the frontiers and of fifty kilometers along the shores of the country." (Emphasis added)

The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal ones, in the public sector. Article 32: "Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners under equality of circumstances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable. In time of peace no foreigner can serve in the Army nor in the police or public security forces.

"The Mexican constitution guarantees that immigrants will never be treated as real Mexican citizens, even if they are legally naturalized. Article 32 bans foreigners, immigrants, and even naturalized citizens of Mexico from serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports:   "In order to belong to the National Navy or the Air Force, and to discharge any office or commission, it is required to be a Mexican by birth. This same status is indispensable for captains, pilots, masters, engineers, mechanics, and in general, for all personnel of the crew of any vessel or airship protected by the Mexican merchant flag or insignia. It is also necessary to be Mexican by birth to discharge the position of captain of the port and all services of practique and airport commandant, as well as all functions of customs agent in the Republic." An immigrant who becomes a naturalized Mexican citizen can be stripped of his Mexican citizenship if he lives again in the country of his origin for more than five years, under Article 37. Mexican-born citizens risk no such loss. Foreign-born, naturalized Mexican citizens may not become federal lawmakers (Article 55), cabinet secretaries (Article 91) or supreme court justices (Article 95).  The president of Mexico, like the president of the United States, constitutionally must be a citizen by birth, but Article 82 of the Mexican constitution mandates that the president's parents also be Mexican-born citizens, thus according secondary status to Mexican-born citizens born of immigrants.  

The Mexican constitution forbids immigrants and naturalized citizens to become members of the clergy. Article 130 says, "To practice the ministry of any denomination in the United Mexican States it is necessary to be a Mexican by birth."

The Mexican constitution singles out "undesirable aliens." Article 11 guarantees federal protection against "undesirable aliens resident in the country." 

The Mexican constitution provides the right of private individuals to make citizen's arrests. Article 16 states, "in cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities." Therefore, the Mexican constitution appears to grant Mexican citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution.

The Mexican constitution states that foreigners may be expelled for any reason and without due process. According to Article 33, "the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action.

"Notional policy options Mexico and the United States have much to learn from one another's laws and practices on immigration and naturalization. A study of the immigration and citizenship portions of the Mexican constitution leads to a search for new policy options to find a fair and equitable solution to the immigration problem in the United States. Two contrary options would require reciprocity, while doing the utmost to harmonize U.S.-Mexican relations:

1. Mexico should amend its constitution to guarantee immigrants to Mexico the same rights it demands the United States give to immigrants from Mexico; or 

2. The United States should impose the same restrictions on Mexican immigrants that Mexico imposes on American immigrants. These options are only notional, of course. They are intended only to help push the immigration debate in a more sensible direction. They simply illustrate the hypocrisy of the Mexican government's current immigration demands on the United States - as well as the emptiness of most Democrat and Republican proposals for immigration reform. Mexico, like the United States, certainly has every right to control who enters its borders, and to expel foreigners who break its laws. The Mexican constitution is designed to give the strongest protections possible to the country's national security. Mexico's internal immigration policy is Mexico's business. 

However, since Mexican political leaders from the ruling party and the opposition have been demanding that the United States ignore, alter or abolish its own immigration laws, they have opened their own internal affairs to American scrutiny. The time has come to examine Mexico's own glass house. 

Disgusted,
DebDAiRob
View All    |   Sort by Newest First
Letter Comments
Total Comments: 50
pjamerican,  on 05/06/2008 @ 11:45 PM  wrote:
Great article. If you have not registered with one of the following groups, please do so. numbersusa.com saveourstate.org grassfire.org californiaforpopulationstableazation.com (capwiz.com) minutemanhq.com americansforlegalimmigration.com This is a battle that we must win if we want to save our Country from Foreign Invasion. Thanks for your great information
JDog,  on 05/07/2008 @ 05:10 PM  wrote:
There is no doubt that there is a double standard with Mexico in regard to their immigration / emmigration policies. They are, of course, only looking out for themselves. Why not send their unemployed to another country? That suits them perfectly. It's time the American people wake up and do something about it.
JM4Change,  on 05/09/2008 @ 03:10 PM  wrote:
This was an interesting letter. Mexico may want to reform their laws. I don't think it really means anything for the US, as we should do what is right for our country regardless of what Mexico says. At the same time, we should listen to other countries' suggestions and weigh them, regardless of whether we think the country itself is hypocritical in making those suggestions.
BennyBoy,  on 05/12/2008 @ 07:29 PM  wrote:
It is pretty interesting how they expect their citizens to be treated in the US when they are doing these things in their own country.
Cangel,  on 05/13/2008 @ 10:13 AM  wrote:
Thank you. It is nice to see in writing the way the Mexican Government really feels about immigrants and immigration. Maybe we should substitute United States for Mexico and post it on our borders.
jovnyc,  on 05/15/2008 @ 12:04 PM  wrote:
As I believe that Mexico is responsible for the poverty of its citizens, I think we should hold their feet to the fire. They should be making conditions so that their poor don't want to leave to find decent jobs.
Erin285,  on 05/16/2008 @ 02:48 PM  wrote:
i agree with this letter. You make some great points about the double standards in Mexico governments.
seatlesiri,  on 05/20/2008 @ 10:49 PM  wrote:
it is right for any country to have its own rights to maintain any kind of order
maxxster,  on 05/25/2008 @ 02:07 PM  wrote:
Great research done to publish this letter. I believe different policies work better for different countries. Lets hold our county's interest in the front a think about immigrants level headed.
Johnny5000,  on 05/29/2008 @ 06:55 PM  wrote:
Let's be level headed about immigration? Okay. Let's reward those that come to this country illegally and spit in the faces that do it by the book. No one like anyone that cuts in line, and that's what illegal immigrants do, plain and simple.
Harley20,  on 05/31/2008 @ 05:22 PM  wrote:
I really am tired of worrying about every other country. I know it is the humane thing to do to worry about those who are hungry, without clean water, dying of diseases and/or oppressed. I am just sick of helping everyone else. We need to heal our own country and quit trying to help everyone else.
cotton0821,  on 06/05/2008 @ 08:43 AM  wrote:
I think Mexico's immigration laws are enlightened. Perhaps our leaders could learn from them. Oops, we do not enforce the laws we have on the books now. New ones would not help.
SAdams,  on 06/09/2008 @ 12:40 PM  wrote:
Yes I think that there are double standards in Mexico, but as JDog quite rightly pointed out it suits the Mexicans to remove the unemployed. But we must take pity on the individual who comes to seek a better life in our country.
AnnaBov,  on 06/11/2008 @ 03:39 PM  wrote:
Your research is admirable but, like many lawmakers, I still feel torn between both sides of the spectrum. Dealings within legal and illegal immigration have many faces, stories, positive and negative consequences, as well as opinions. Your letter still hasn't made up my mind...
pnkprincesswcu,  on 06/12/2008 @ 05:50 PM  wrote:
Thank you for this article. You have definitly done your research on the Mexican constitution. Very interesting.
gravitonring,  on 06/13/2008 @ 09:23 AM  wrote:
Thanks for your letter DebDAiRob. Rats! I have been dreaming about retiring to Mexico for over 60 years :) Seriously, This is all new information to me. I hope the governments of the earth soon develop a universal sense of the family of humans. And maybe even the commonality in the hypothetical construct of our habitation on the earth.
msbyte,  on 06/13/2008 @ 07:26 PM  wrote:
Thank you for sharing this. Far to many people are ignorant of the fact that there is a subversive takeover in progress. The sad part is people are in the middle of government greed and power plays.
Claire,  on 06/15/2008 @ 02:17 PM  wrote:
You make some good points about the Mexican approach to immigration, but I wondered about your agenda. It seems to me that the U.S. would do well to become more selective as well.
jakimyny1,  on 06/17/2008 @ 01:02 AM  wrote:
I couldn't agree with you more. It's ridiculous that Mexico can okay rallies towards the United States because we don't legalize their illegal immigrants here but they so carelessly discriminate in their laws.
tennansm,  on 06/17/2008 @ 06:52 AM  wrote:
Mexico does not have the resources to help their poor. American's don't move to Mexico for menial labor, the american's moving there are retiring not looking to improve their lot in life.
xoxobethanyxox,  on 06/17/2008 @ 07:09 AM  wrote:
I agree that it is unfair how Mexico is dealing with the immigrant policies, and our country needs to figure out a happy medium between how we are doing it now and Mexico's extreme ways.
MsMisunderstood,  on 06/17/2008 @ 07:44 AM  wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly with this post. It sickens me that we continue to walk on egg shells regarding immigration and yet we would not be treated with the same equality or respect if the situation was reversed. It's the same thing with the words "One Nation Under God..." People in our own country are trying to ban these words when in fact this nation was founded upon Christianity. Yet, if we visited a Muslim country, for example, we would be expected to respect their religious culture. Take this into consideration when casting your vote in the upcoming election!!!
skreemastr,  on 06/17/2008 @ 08:29 AM  wrote:
It's sickening the way we react to people trying to better themselves.Wonder how people would feel with the shoe on the other foot
mmmpeachy,  on 06/17/2008 @ 08:59 AM  wrote:
I've always kind of been disgusted by Mexico's double-standard against Americans (or anyone not Mexican, for that matter). However, your letter has really opened my eyes to their hypocrisy. The one question I have, though, is why our government is content to let the current circumstances stand. I find it odd that we have let them dictate our immigration laws, etc. for so lond. It smells.
Fi03_31,  on 06/17/2008 @ 09:38 AM  wrote:
They are such hypocrites!!! A completely corrupt government that takes advantage of our generosity every chance they can!
Fi03_31,  on 06/17/2008 @ 09:39 AM  wrote:
They are such hypocrites!!! A completely corrupt government that takes advantage of our generosity every chance they can!
ashorey79,  on 06/17/2008 @ 10:49 AM  wrote:
I do not understand the double standard with Mexico. The citizens of Mexico don't want illegal immigrants as much as we do. But the government of Mexico tells the citizens to go to the us.
EHandel,  on 06/17/2008 @ 10:52 AM  wrote:
Mexico must have the most corrupt government of any country I can think off. Some things that are going on are horrible
bcamber19,  on 06/17/2008 @ 10:55 AM  wrote:
You have definately inspired me to take as much action as I can regarding this situation. I found this letter very interesting.
lind2020,  on 06/17/2008 @ 10:57 AM  wrote:
I agree with this letter entirely, we certainly cannot afford to miss this clear opportunity. Once we embrace this as a relaity well all be far better off
ShanaC,  on 06/17/2008 @ 11:19 AM  wrote:
This is interesting information. I had not heard this before...it definitely gives the American public something to consider.
acadinfo,  on 06/17/2008 @ 11:22 AM  wrote:
Yes, this does seem pretty shrewd on the part of the Mexican government. At the same time, we have to address our own problems since our officials obviously don't have much sway in Mexico.
fenway19,  on 06/17/2008 @ 11:30 AM  wrote:
Part of me wants to adopt mexico's idea of how to deal with the outrageous number of illegal immigrants in our country. but another part of me thinks about how the u.s. is better than that. there should be a middle ground somewhere so that the u.s. is not taking care of illegal immigrants or immigrants period when our own citizens are not even all taken care of. fenway19
jennycgreen,  on 06/17/2008 @ 12:23 PM  wrote:
The Mexican government is clearly looking out for themselves. Maybe its time for us to do the same!
fieari,  on 06/17/2008 @ 12:28 PM  wrote:
Immigrants should become citizens before engaging in public discourse. They should go through legal means before receiving public benefits. Now, maybe laws should be changed to make it easier to become a citizen, especially if you're making a good faith effort to be one, but legitimizing illegal immigrants is not the right idea.
Kariinbliss,  on 06/17/2008 @ 01:50 PM  wrote:
The immigrant population of the United States would NEVER allow the US Constitution or Immigration Laws to be that restrictive. We would have riots all over. They should be, however. Why is it that we need to give equal status to everybody on the planet, but other countries don't? So they can send their people here to work, and send money back home!
AS3122,  on 06/17/2008 @ 02:07 PM  wrote:
Just like a parent who never follows through will have a spoiled brat for a child, American will never have control if it can't follow through on its own rules.
CarolCC,  on 06/17/2008 @ 02:08 PM  wrote:
Deb, See www.spp.gov. Our government has never intended to stop immigration, illegal or otherwise. BTW: great letter.
JPJPaul,  on 06/18/2008 @ 01:51 PM  wrote:
I mean really, shouldn't countries protect their own best interests first? We certainly do.
calvin_makail1,  on 06/19/2008 @ 11:50 AM  wrote:
i think they should only open the borders to the ones that have taken the time to become a citizen and has taken the test before they come thru
Tidefan,  on 06/20/2008 @ 10:07 PM  wrote:
Very interesting. I'm not versed on Mexican constitutional law, but this paper raises lots of question about hypocrisy south of the border.
Jew_Bagel,  on 06/21/2008 @ 06:58 AM  wrote:
Not only are they trying to force our hand on immigration... they are now trying to dictate which convicted criminals we can and cannot execute, including a Mexican who raped and murdered two teens. Mexico trying to tell any country how to run any part of its governing body is wholly laughable.
dmullenbach,  on 06/21/2008 @ 07:46 AM  wrote:
It is very interesting that we are to take in all Mexicans and treat them as our own, when they treat immigrants so poorly. Seems pretty hypocritical to me.
jfrodo,  on 06/21/2008 @ 07:38 PM  wrote:
You'd be surprised the amount of human rights violations done by the Mexican Government's army and Policia Federal to central american illegal immigrants. Some are shot dead and left dead on train tracks to make it look like the train ran them over. The U.S. government at least holds them and sends them back alive.
chicks8439,  on 06/22/2008 @ 12:44 PM  wrote:
Another fact: if an American is caught sneaking over the border into Mexico they will go to jail for several years.
mystermyke1,  on 07/06/2008 @ 12:19 AM  wrote:
Mexico's laws are flawed outdated and extremily bogus. i would rather look up antarica laws. opposed to Mexico's laws. Smells like a good ol fashion war brewing. can a have a rifle and one way ticket to El Paso?
YYY1,  on 07/29/2008 @ 04:47 PM  wrote:
Wow, that was informative. I think what we need at the border is a giant mirror. Let the Mexicans take a good look at themselves and what they represent, before they start looking over here and pointing fingers.
1isSm0ked,  on 08/31/2008 @ 01:26 PM  wrote:
So, Mexico likes their "white Mexicans" and wants to weed out the poor and non-elite. That's what Hitler also wanted. America needs to close the borders to all Mexicans, poor or otherwise and then let Mexico take care of their own for a change.
rumzi317,  on 01/08/2009 @ 07:44 AM  wrote:
There is a huge double standard with Mexico with there immagrants. Treat others the way you want to be treated.
edlinux,  on 03/13/2009 @ 04:37 AM  wrote:
i think u full of stuff thats not true did u get it from google