WTC 7 Not Mentioned in Official 9-11 Report

Related Issues: Intelligence , Law Enforcement , Science / Technology , Free Speech

Tags: calling for a scientific investigation of wtc 7

Thursday, 04/10/2008 @ 10:49 AM

To whom it may concern:

Please carefully consider that WTC 7 was not hit by an aircraft on 9-11, was not attacked by terrorists, and only small fires that were not spreading and were contained on only one side of the building on the 12th floor were observed, yet the entire 47 story tall concrete and steel skyscraper building "buckled" in the center, penthouse first, then came straight down very quickly in a mere 6.5 seconds at free fall, not impeded in any manner whatsoever by any of the numerous floors below, imploding from within precisely into it's own footprints, the concrete pulverized and vaporized into toxic dust and powder, resulting in huge, billowing, pyroclastic clouds, and the massive steel core columns (18) cut and hurled horizontally, a truly perfect, classic example of a building brought down with deliberate purpose, and with a very high degree of advanced professional skills and substantial expert experience in a controlled fashion.

The Twin Towers also came straight down into their own footprints very quickly in less than 12 seconds each in a similar controlled fashion.

Most certainly a scientific investigation is called for to examine the scientific facts surrounding the probable implosion of WTC 7.

Please carefully consider that scientific facts once officially revealed to the nation can free the American people, their Congress, and their President, from the constant fear and terror generated by and since 9-11.

References:

1. EXCLUSIVE INN WORLD REPORT INTERVIEW with Physics Professor Dr Crockett Grabbe and Dr David Ray Griffin, "INN Takes on the History Channel", - LINK - CLICK on TUE SEPTEMBER 04 for their complete interviews regarding 9-11.

2. Noted Architect Richard Gage - WTC 7 Controlled Demolition - Video LINK

3. Massive steel core columns cut with molten steel present - LINK

Sincerely,

FastLane8

Total Comments: 37

Write your own comment on this letter!

	Kungfu, on 04/21/2008 @ 01:39 PM wrote:
		Very few believe anything but what the Faux news has telivised. George Orwells new speak is in order today. The truth will come out. Try Reverse speach for starters to understand the truth

	RubyTwilight, on 04/21/2008 @ 04:22 PM wrote:
		Wow. I'm not really sure what to make of this. I have heard of this before and thought it was a hollow accusation. I am not completely convinced, but I will definitely look into this. It wouldn't surprise me if there were fabrications, given our government and our President.

	FastLane8, on 04/22/2008 @ 06:39 AM wrote:
		Most folks are not aware of wtc7 (think twin towers). However, the fact that this building came down all by itself on the same day is the "sore thumb" of 9-11. It stands out screaming for your attention. Everyone has to ask, wow, what happened to you? Someone smacked you good. Let's investigate this whole thing once and for all.

	AgnesMack, on 05/02/2008 @ 12:00 AM wrote:
		Well, to be fair there have also been scores of architects, physisits and everyone else explaining how it could have happened just like the politicians said.

	FastLane8, on 05/02/2008 @ 04:57 PM wrote:
		Those who are accepting the official 9-11 story hands down without checking the facts backed up by science are just getting themselves hoodwinked big time. Better to ask some questions, investigate, let science do the talking.

	JenoHubay, on 06/02/2008 @ 09:45 PM wrote:
		I hardly know what to say - conspiracy theories seem to be built into the human psyche. "Lord, I'd like to file a bug report . . . "

	pbrown69, on 06/09/2008 @ 09:14 PM wrote:
		It is a sad fact when a substantial portion of our nation believes 9/11 was staged...There is a great book put out by "Popular Mechanics" that debunks these claims...Please read it and return to the land of the sane. You're smarter than to fall for this.

	OrdinaryName, on 06/10/2008 @ 02:41 AM wrote:
		The families of those who lost their lives on 9-11 don't need to have conspiracy theorists running their mouths just to hear the sound of their voices.

	newsarafree81, on 06/15/2008 @ 09:06 PM wrote:
		I don't know what to think anymore, our administration has exploited 9/11 to the point that the number is used as a punchline.

	HoovaHard, on 06/16/2008 @ 01:09 AM wrote:
		half the world knows that 911 was / IS an inside job... the other half is watching American idol..

	SammySunshine, on 06/17/2008 @ 08:45 AM wrote:
		This is not a new argument, from the day of 9/11, conspiracy theorists have abounded with everything from dubious video "evidence" to links to "reputable" specialists who say that none of this could have possibly happened without explosives or other assistance. Please. Talk to 100 doctors, who are all specialists in their field, and you will get at least that many perspectives on it. Stop looking for things that aren't there. Maybe you should look under your bed, and make really sure the boogeyman isn't there too.

	SammySunshine, on 06/17/2008 @ 08:52 AM wrote:
		This is not a new argument, from the day of 9/11, conspiracy theorists have abounded with everything from dubious video "evidence" to links to "reputable" specialists who say that none of this could have possibly happened without explosives or other assistance. Please. Talk to 100 doctors, who are all specialists in their field, and you will get at least that many perspectives on it. Stop looking for things that aren't there. Maybe you should look under your bed, and make really sure the boogeyman isn't there too. SammySunshine

	wrreid, on 06/17/2008 @ 11:08 AM wrote:
		I'm tired of these smoking gun theories regarding 9/11. Does anyone remember the conspiracy theories surrounding Pearl Harbor? Those are as laughable as our government bombing our own citizens. Sorry.

	shannon, on 06/17/2008 @ 12:15 PM wrote:
		Interesting. A lot of 9/11 doesn't add up. I'm by no means claiming that terrorists did not fly planes into the towers, but I think there is a lot more to what happened on 9/11 than the government has told us.

	publishworm, on 06/17/2008 @ 01:39 PM wrote:
		We need to know what shortcust in the buildings construction where allowed and by whom so it never happens again. Too much corruption where "big" money is happening.

	skelly7483, on 06/17/2008 @ 06:38 PM wrote:
		Look, Iremeber being in my bed sick whrn my wife sais " we are being attacked". And that is exactly what happened. Take your dumb conspiracy thoeries elsewhere.

	lwilkinson315, on 06/17/2008 @ 06:58 PM wrote:
		Hmmmm so in other words- while people were trying to make their way out of the Twin Towers a demo team was rigging building 7 to implode??? Nah- I dont think so.....

	helfrich, on 06/17/2008 @ 09:21 PM wrote:
		you need to get some meds. To much time on your hands is not good. Oh and Elvis is alive also.

	labrockett, on 06/17/2008 @ 10:52 PM wrote:
		the washington naval yard was never mentioned either

	skingw, on 06/18/2008 @ 05:37 PM wrote:
		Which is scarier, the idea that the government could kill thousands of our own people and then cover it up, or the fact that millions of people THINK that the government could kill thousands of our own people and cover it up? Whether the "Truthers" or the government are closer to what really happened, we have a serious problem here. I fear it is going to get messy if we don't retake control of our government again and cut it down to size. Our Federal government is now much more dangerous to our liberties and our way of life than any group of terrorists.

	Brodieman, on 06/19/2008 @ 11:06 AM wrote:
		9-11 was a terrible tragedy that will remain in out harts forever. Even as more evidence comes out... the vicitims and their families are the most important Brodieman

	ceciliaraespam, on 06/19/2008 @ 11:24 AM wrote:
		And we didn't land on the moon either, right? I think your tin foil hat is impeding your ability to think.

	jbushwhat, on 06/19/2008 @ 12:22 PM wrote:
		They try to hide too much from us. Forget security clearances. Who decides who gets to know what, I want to know what they know.

	satyr, on 06/19/2008 @ 04:49 PM wrote:
		Conspiracy theorists - is a NeoCon Buzzword. ignore it. Faith is knowing the truth in the midst of the Evil one.

	TheyAreWatchingMe, on 06/19/2008 @ 06:33 PM wrote:
		The great Steve Earle once said "Just cause you ain't paranoid don't mean they ain't out to get ya." I live by those words. The government ain't looking out for you like they used to. And no, I don't believe man ever landed on the moon either.

	cstolarzyk, on 06/20/2008 @ 04:34 PM wrote:
		The most ignorant people are those who believe what their government tells them. If you look at facts, they dont even have to be about wtc7, you will see that it is impossible for 9/11 to go the way that the government said. In a time of decit telling the truth is a revolutionary act- george orwell

	theladyfatimah, on 06/20/2008 @ 07:29 PM wrote:
		fact that millions of people THINK that the government could kill thousands of our own people and cover it up? Whether the "Truthers" or the government are closer to what really happened,

	mnmarty03, on 06/21/2008 @ 05:20 PM wrote:
		I agree that media coverage is biased and isn't truthful - that we were fed stories about 9-11 that weren't true, in one respect or another. I don't know specifically about the ideas of the towers being dropped by proffesionals - but I do agree that it's very likely. I think you raise an interesting thought, that I'll have to look into. Thanks!

	wendit13, on 06/21/2008 @ 05:37 PM wrote:
		I think it will be long past all of us are dead before the real truth to everything is ever released. Sad that the government can make anything disappear that they'd like to.

	FastLane8, on 06/22/2008 @ 08:50 AM wrote:
		AZ State Senator Karen Johnson delivered an insightful floor speech on 9-11. If interested Link CLICK HERE or paste in your browser http://azleg.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=7 click on "video" on the line for June 10/Senate Floor.

	britestar87, on 06/27/2008 @ 01:41 PM wrote:
		I have often heard of conspiracy theories surrounding the WTC. I have yet to see an argument that was as reasonable and calm as yours. While I'm certainly far from agreeing that there was something suspicious on our part, it is possible that the attack was more involved than we know - perhaps the terrorists were able to infiltrate these buildings long before 9-11. I would urge caution to those with these theories, however, as you must be careful to not devalue the suffering of the families involved. No matter the causes, those families suffered great losses, and that is a tragedy from any point of view.

	darealtystik, on 07/02/2008 @ 09:39 AM wrote:
		Thank you, finally, somebody who sees the ridiculousness in these behemoth buildings collapsing in a matter of seconds....come on people don't be blinded by what you see and hear on these news programs that are politically ran to begin with

	FastLane8, on 07/02/2008 @ 03:41 PM wrote:
		Wow, Canada is now considering a 9/11 Resolution to conduct their own investigations wherever they lead, Link Paste in your browser for more info http://www.opednews.com/articles/Canadian-Parliament-Consid-by-Gene-Cappa-080629-412.html

	MCarey64, on 07/09/2008 @ 12:49 PM wrote:
		As a person who is from the NY area and lost people that day this is hard for me to read. I am always open to looking into things.. this one is hard though I have to admit that science is always the best method. The truth is in the facts not the fiction written out.

	rebecca9588, on 07/14/2008 @ 09:20 PM wrote:
		What? What about all the people there? What about all the witnessess? what about the photos from non- press people? What about all the people who lost their lives? And here I thought Elvis was really dead.

	Johnny5000, on 07/22/2008 @ 10:19 AM wrote:
		Good grief. This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

	Boobelle, on 07/22/2008 @ 10:58 PM wrote:
		For something like this, you have THREE references??? You're talking engineering, architecture, and physics--some very, very difficult concepts. And you feel, truly feel, that three references adequately covers this topic? And what is the background for these references? How exactly are they qualified to be making these types of assertions? This is something that should probably have at least one full page of references to be even slightly credible.