Respect for General Petreus and Our Military

Related Issues:  Iraq Conflict

Tags:  war , hearings , military respect , petreus , iraq war

Wednesday, 04/09/2008 @ 06:00 PM
To whom it may concern:

Our elected officials should have more respect for General Petraeus and the work he's done in Iraq.

It's one thing to question our Generals, to demand and receive updates from the field. But it's another to disrespect the people charged with performing difficult jobs. General Petraeus has been labeled a liar even before he delivers his report. He's been told to dare not deliver positive news from Iraq, even as he continues to oversee a successful operation. As a citizen and tax payer I look forward to and expect that leaders like General Petraeus report on the progress of his military command, one that costs the taxpayers a great deal of money. But I hang my head in shame at the behavior of political leaders as they question the General. And I wonder that if the questions were more direct, would these leaders have more time to attend to other important issues?

Government spending skyrockets, government interference in all aspects of citizens' lives climbs to unprecedented levels, scandals occur with increasing frequency, and many officials keep proposing higher and higher tax burdens on the American citizens. Both the Presidents' and Congress' approval ratings stand at all time lows because of the poor job being done to govern this nation. Perhaps the hard eye should be one looking in a mirror, perhaps the harsh words should be directed within the chambers of government rather than at a man, General Petraeus, who performs his duty and performs it well.

Please honor this man for his leadership in the field, and for his patience at home. Please give him and all who serve in the military the respect they're due, even when tough questions have to be asked of them.

Be Well,
fcabanski
View All    |   Sort by Newest First
Letter Comments
Total Comments: 30
Bracholi,  on 04/10/2008 @ 08:39 AM  wrote:
Well put.
JM4Change,  on 04/12/2008 @ 03:26 PM  wrote:
I wish Rumsfeld would have listened to military commanders earlier. The situation would be a lot better.
mwnoble,  on 04/13/2008 @ 06:53 AM  wrote:
The unfortunate tragedy of war is that it uses man's best to do man's worst
BennyBoy,  on 04/13/2008 @ 04:36 PM  wrote:
I love how that start calling him a liar days before he even speaks before congress. How's that for recpect...
Katya,  on 04/14/2008 @ 12:46 PM  wrote:
Yes, the man serves in a very difficult arena, in a questionable war, with the odds against him. He is doing his job admirably and with great dignity. He deserves honor and respect regardless of one's feelings about the war. Your paragraph about the chambers of government taking a look in the mirror is brilliant.
fcabanski,  on 04/14/2008 @ 01:05 PM  wrote:
I think Rumsfeld was guilty only of optimism. It's the real world, folks, even though war is a horror, sometimes war is necessary in the real world.
JerseyGuy,  on 04/15/2008 @ 04:53 AM  wrote:
I think General Petraeus proves what can be done when the military is allowed to plan and manage a war rather than politicians and State Department diplomats. The sedate questions from the Democratic Presidential candidates of Petraeus at the Senate hearings were further proof of the recent sucess in Iraq. Their mantras of "failures" and "civil war" were absent from their questions.
FastLane8,  on 04/15/2008 @ 01:18 PM  wrote:
Sure, respect our troops in uniform, no question, but let's remember they took an oath to the constitution not to a president or the policy. Since when did Americans let a president lie to them and let him get away with it? Marine General Peter Pace Chairman of the Joint Chiefs got it right when he said about all troops at the National Press Club on February 17, 2006. "It's the absolute responsibility of everybody in uniform to disobey an order that is either illegal or immoral". That means everybody from the private all the way up to the general has a duty to think about what's going on and speak up if it's not right.
BennyBoy,  on 04/16/2008 @ 05:39 PM  wrote:
Fastlane8, maybe Petraeus doesn't believe that the war is illegal or immoral...
JM4Change,  on 04/18/2008 @ 01:13 PM  wrote:
Rumsfeld stuck his nose where it didn't belong. The man had no military tactical experience, and showed a complete disregard for a culturally sensitive approach. That is why military commanders called for and received his resignation. He screwed up at every turn, lying to the American public, getting his war, and then completely mismanaging it. Other than partisanship, why would you defend this guy?
Killabyte,  on 04/20/2008 @ 09:38 PM  wrote:
It's sad that the political party that represents half the American voters believes that is in their political best interest to give the General "warnings" about what he shouldn't tell the American people. Sad.
fcabanski,  on 04/20/2008 @ 10:51 PM  wrote:
JM4Change, Rumsfeld helped get us into this war which ousted Hussein, and which killed many high placed terror leaders. He did a fine job.
LouisZ03,  on 04/27/2008 @ 09:24 AM  wrote:
I totally agree with this letter. The soldiers are just doing their jobs. I would bet that most of them would rather be doing something other than worrying about being shot everyday of their lives.
jaminthebody,  on 05/12/2008 @ 02:15 PM  wrote:
Gen. Petraeus has done an excellent job. It's time the main stream media should start doing their job and tell the truth about progress in Iraq.
ummhafsa,  on 05/24/2008 @ 06:03 PM  wrote:
The only honor befitting a liar and collusionist like general petraus is a nice big "blanket party." Organizers and participants should start lining up now.
citizenjane,  on 06/08/2008 @ 04:31 PM  wrote:
Very well written. I do think we should respect those who have been asked to serve this country. I also think just as legislators are trying to hold Petraeus accountable, all voters should hold our legislators accountable for the job they are doing- or not doing. citizenjane
leto17,  on 06/15/2008 @ 08:26 AM  wrote:
Whereas I deeply disagree with your assessment of the Bush administration. I agree with this. General Petraeus help0ed keep the north and Mosul quiet when he commanded the 101st up North. He's well-versed in counterinsurgency and can be counted on to do a good job.
rdgoldean,  on 06/17/2008 @ 07:54 AM  wrote:
Our military certainly deserves our respect. Basically, they turn their entire life over to our country in order to protect and defend the freedom we live under. They must go where sent, when sent, and follow orders every day.
Cbra131,  on 06/17/2008 @ 08:24 AM  wrote:
You do not have to agree with the war, but you do have to support the troops!
sim18169,  on 06/17/2008 @ 09:48 AM  wrote:
All troops that fight for America should be respected and honored. Sure, they chose to go fight but still they do not pick the fights. The job is tough they get trained as fighters and get turned into police officers but it is a job our troops can handle and they have been proving that. The road to peace is not just leaving what is destroyed but staying to help rebuild it.
skelly7483,  on 06/17/2008 @ 06:41 PM  wrote:
|Our military leaders are who need to be in charge of this war, not the government.
PineBaroness,  on 06/20/2008 @ 11:32 PM  wrote:
Right on the mark. I was appalled by the tone of the questioning at the hearings. It seemed that the General was treated disrespectfully because he didn’t tell them what they wanted to hear, he told them the truth.
lise63,  on 06/21/2008 @ 12:38 AM  wrote:
He serves as an adviser to Bush on the war - he's just as much to blame as the other Bush flunkies.
grantc1,  on 06/22/2008 @ 04:27 PM  wrote:
I wish all Americans had more respect for our servicemen in general. We all need to know that they do not have to do what they do and they volunteer. I only wish we all that kind of courage. we would be a greater nation if that was so.
lasermannm,  on 06/24/2008 @ 06:43 PM  wrote:
As a decorated Vetern, I totally agree. Gen Petreus was very disrespected by our elected officials. Here is a man who voluntarily is serving our country to protect the rights of those demeaning him and all of thoses serving under him.
jhopwood,  on 07/02/2008 @ 12:39 PM  wrote:
The Founding Fathers did not want a standing army as they saw it -- correctly -- as a threat to democracy. The military was kept small for that reason, until the imposition of the military-congressional-industrial complex (that career military officer Dwight Eisenhower warned us about) with World War II and the Cold War. Generals are dumb SOBs, as Harry Truman (one of the people responsible for the large military, ironically) and should be disrespected and viewed suspiciously. This is America, not Nazi Germany.
nomoreliberals,  on 08/15/2008 @ 07:58 AM  wrote:
People have soured the legacy and intergrity of a man that is ensuring the safety and security of our nation. I respect him and always will as he's done a great job and has only been sullied for it.
elpasos2,  on 08/19/2008 @ 12:40 PM  wrote:
i agree with this letter. i think we have to remember they are just doing their job. if bush says go they just cant say no. i mean none of us are over there so who is to say he i lying. they deserve respect!!!
politico88,  on 01/12/2009 @ 02:21 AM  wrote:
I think that all the members of the military should be thanked repeatedly for the sacrifices they make everyday. Their families too. We are safe because of them.
wcb1315,  on 04/02/2009 @ 12:50 PM  wrote:
Honor the taxpayer as much as the the military and we'll all be happy